Leave a Legacy Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260395247
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Garden City, KS, USA
Phone
6206403686
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-30,831
Expenses
$14,368
Assets
$450,246

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER FAHRMEIER (President)
  • KATRINA UNGER (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER FAHRMEIER (President)
  • KATRINA UNGER (Vice President)
  • WENDY JUST (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization formed to strengthen the cancer resources and treatments available to those in western Kansas; and to further the research needed to strive for cures of all types of cancer.

What it reported doing in 2025

Organization formed to strengthen the cancer resources and treatments available to those in western Kansas; and to further the research needed to strive for cures of all types of cancer.this objective is accomplished by holding an annual 5k/10k run to raise cancer awareness. The organization was able to use funds in 2025 to assist the local cancer center by providing items to be handed out to patients to assist with their travel needs and to assist patients with their medical bills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -146.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.34; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.