Leahs Hope Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821602287
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Midwest City, OK, USA
Phone
4054556116
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Victims' Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,199
Expenses
$167,231
Assets
$250,096
Liabilities
$7,341

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brittany L Hussain (Executive Director)
  • Shari Lopp (President)
  • Alan Duncan (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brittany L Hussain (Executive Director)
  • KELLEY TUCKER (CASE MANAGER)
  • SARAH TIDMORE (CASE MANAGER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Leahs Hope is to empower women and families who are struggling and seeking a better life to change their life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Annex: Houses food, cleaning and household supplies, personal items (feminine hygiene products, shampoo, soap, limited clothing, and full selection of baby items including diapers).Has kitchen with large fridge/freezer that allows storage for emergency food supplies for residents of the program. The annex served seven families (43 individuals) in 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.9%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 51.6%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.9% of revenue deployed · 51.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.