League of Women Voters of Milwaukee Co Sub League of Women Voters of Wisconsin

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
396096750
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
Location
West Allis, WI, USA
Phone
4142738683
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voter Education, Registration

Reported finances

Revenue
$193,202
Expenses
$127,186
Assets
$269,069
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY MALONEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY ELLEN SPICUZZA (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GAIL SKLODOWSKA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PEG SCHRADER (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NANCY MALONEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY ELLEN SPICUZZA (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GAIL SKLODOWSKA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The league of women voters is a nonpartisan organization that empowers voters and defends democracy by supporting and educating voters and promoting active civic engagement.

What it reported doing in 2024

Voter services: in total, across fiscal year 2024-2025, our community outreach effort resulted in 1,168 voter registrations. We assisted over 220 people in requesting absentee ballots. We educated over 8,267 people through face-to-face contact. All of our efforts are directed to those who are traditionally underserved and disenfranchised. We accomplished this work through the efforts of nearly 700 dedicated volunteers, who contributed over 1,956 hours to our cause. Comite por el voto latinx partnered with over 25 community institutions and organized 46 resource tables to reach over 2,729 individuals with the league's bilingual materials. Comite por el voto latinx produced bilingual election resource guides for four elections and, along with other materials, translated these guides into spanish, which were shared with approximately 50 organizations or community leaders. The community outreach team hosted 49 events with 39 different partner organizations, resulting in 184 voter registrations and 1,446 conversations with individuals about voting. Three community and nonprofit organization online voter registration training sessions were held with approximately 72 people in attendance. The high school voter registration team assisted 403 students with voter registration and made 44 visits to area high schools. The milwaukee county jail (mcj) and community reintegration center (crc) voter registration team conducted 29 registration events, helped register approximately 106 people, requested 125 absentee ballots, and spoke with 216 individuals who expressed interest in voting. The public library outreach team hosted 19 voter registration events at the central and branch libraries, where we assisted in registering 63 individuals and provided literature and information to 487 people. Our team attended the swearing-in ceremonies for newly naturalized citizens and held 30 voter registration events, helping to register 397 people and distributing information to 3,765 people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.6%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.6% of revenue deployed · 81.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $103K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.