League for Animals and People of the Summit
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841157625
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Frisco, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7203730837
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $187,326
- Expenses
- $92,212
- Assets
- $179,013
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSLYN MCGILL (President)
People named in this filing
- JESSLYN MCGILL (President)
- LAUREN CHASE (Treasurer)
- JANET GOOD (MBRSHP DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The League for Animals & People of the Summit was established in 1990 and obtained 501(c)(3) status in 1992. We work to reduce the number of unwanted pets through comprehensive spay/neuter programs and give financial aid to low income residents to obtain necessary veterinary care for their animals. We seek to promote and enhance the human-animal bond with our financial aid programs and our fun-draisers that get whole families to participate in events with their dogs. L.A.P.S. also financially assists the Summit County Animal Shelter to offset the spay/neuter costs for adoptee animals in residence by subsidizing their entire spay/neuter program through grants LAPS receives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Medical/Surgical Veterinary Assistance
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.1%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 61.1%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.8%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.1% of revenue deployed · 61.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.