Leadingage Illinois
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363512871
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lisle, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6303256170
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,334,628
- Expenses
- $2,844,313
- Assets
- $6,856,092
- Liabilities
- $824,496
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID GUTHRIDGE (CABINET PRESIDENT)
- JACQUELINE SANDER (CABINET PRESIDENT)
- MEGAN TENGERSTROM (CABINET PRESIDENT)
- SHERRY BARTER HAMLIN (CABINET PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA SCHNEPF (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- DANIEL CHURCHILL (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA SCHNEPF (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $334,803 total reported compensation
- DANIEL CHURCHILL (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $182,289 total reported compensation
- SLOANE GRUBB (DIRECTOR OF MEMBERSHIP): $158,140 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancing excellence and innovation in adult life services
What it reported doing in 2024
Government relations: leadingage Illinois provides advocacy and regulatory technical support to members, including state and federal advocacy representation. Activities include education and updates to members on the impact of recent and anticipated legislation, regulatory changes affecting service providers and residents. Leadingage Illinois also educates and alerts legislators on issues and interests of the senior care industry, including coordinating legislator visits and providing quantitative support of legislative challenges. In 2024, leadingage Illinois advocated to pass legislation to create a permanent medication aide program. Medication aides are now permitted in assisted living, supportive living, and nursing homes. Leadingage Illinois worked to unanimously pass a bill allowing nurses in assisted living communities to provide catheter care to residents, eliminating the need for external care. Leadingage Illinois also worked to pass legislation that states that when a health care facility is found liable for an injury to a patient or resident because of a negligent act performed by an agency nurse or cna, the health care facility has a right to be compensated by the nurse agency for any and all expenses, fines, or damages incurred related to any liability for the nurse agency's negligence, including negligent hiring. It further requires a contract entered into between the nurse agency and health care facility to contain a provision specifying that the health care facility has a right to be compensated by the nurse agency for any and all expenses, fines, or damages incurred related to any liability for a negligent act performed by a nurse or cna employed, assigned, or referred by the nurse agency. Leadingage Illinois negotiated a high-priority bill on reporting, postings, and disclosures with more favorable language than initially proposed for life plan communities. This followed extensive advocacy work, including multiple meetings with key legislators. Ultimately, the bill passed with less burdensome requirements. Additionally, leadingage Illinois was able to stop another bill that would have drastically changed the entrance fee refund process for life plan communities. Leadingage Illinois negotiated language on a bill that would have changed the composition of the assisted living advisory board, making it unfair and unbalanced. This would have negatively impacted the provider perspective on the board, which leadingage Illinois created through passed legislation in 2023. We stopped the senate version of this year's bill and negotiated with the sponsor and stakeholders on the house version, simply clarifying the board positions, rather than changing the composition.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $335K · 24 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $119K reported
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.