Leadership SouthCoast Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201662811
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Fall River, MA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,482
Expenses
$148,865
Assets
$104,935
Liabilities
$88,345

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christopher Crawford (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Dawn Camille (Director)
  • Dr Vinnie Rege (Director)
  • Scott Lopes (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate engage and empower diverse individuals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Leadership SouthCoast fulfills its mission primarily through its signature program LEAD SouthCoast an exclusive 10-month immersive training initiative catering to aspiring community leaders. This distinctive program is a pivotal platform that delves into critical areas such as economic development public health arts & culture and more equipping participants with the knowledge and skills needed to address various community challenges effectively. The primary objective of LEAD SouthCoast is to empower a diverse cohort of 25-35 emerging leaders annually hailing from a wide array of organizations spanning the nonprofit private and public sectors to become catalysts for positive change within the region. The organizations commitment to fostering inclusive leadership and civic engagement is evident as it continues to graduate up to 30 individuals each year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.