Leadership Needed Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830508963
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Marietta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042561606
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,422,060
- Expenses
- $77,289
- Assets
- $1,618,318
- Liabilities
- $26,329
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MOHAMMAD BHUIYAN (VICE CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DR RAKTIM SEN (CHAIRMAN)
- DR MOHAMMAD BHUIYAN (VICE CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT)
- MR BILL LANKFORD (TREASURER, EX-OFFICIO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2024
Help colleges and universities (hbcus in particular) in developing a comprehensive entrepreneurship, leadership, financial literacy, career development, and coaching curriculum that is particularly relevant in preparing young men and women to: 1. Develop an entrepreneurial mindset to become more effective and successful in the corporate world. 2. Become successful entrepreneurs by avoiding costly mistakes. 3. Contribute to the generational wealth creation. 4. Become an effective leader and a good human being. Stimulate students' interest in entrepreneurship and provide them with the experience of conceiving business ventures and preparing and presenting business plans. Provide training and networking opportunities to entrepreneurs so that they can move up to the next level. Annual event is held in april each year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.6%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 94.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.94; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 56.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 45.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.