Leadership Greater Hillsboro Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842156014
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-PF 2023
Location
Hillsboro, TX, USA
Phone
2542058654
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Leadership Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,920
Expenses
$3,140
Assets
$12,496
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DARREL BEGGS (DIRECTOR)
  • SHANNON EPLING (DIRECTOR)
  • JUSTIN W LEWIS (DIRECTOR JAN-JUL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of leadership greater hillsboro is to seek out experienced and potential leaders in hill county and provide them with educational programs in leadership development and collaborative problem-solving in order to equip and encourage participants to undertake charitable and community work.

What it reported doing in 2025

Leadership greater hillsboro class of 2024/2025 for their community project proudly planted a native Texas plant garden and built picnic tables at the city of hillsboro pocket park located at the hill pavilion formerly known as the old grimes garage at 325 n. Waco street. The entire city of hillsboro benifited.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 12
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 7.2%; rating input score 7
  • Program expense ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 20

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 64.8%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.98; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 143.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 60.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 7.2% of revenue deployed · 20.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $642 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.