Leadership Birmingham Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 630833118
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Birmingham, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2052524496
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $556,070
- Expenses
- $474,190
- Assets
- $500,883
- Liabilities
- $15,107
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
60 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LIBBA VAUGHAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LIBBA VAUGHAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $123,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Leadership birmingham educates and empowers community leaders to create meaningful civic change.
What it reported doing in 2024
For the 2024-2025 program year, leadership birmingham provided over 270 hours of engaging educational content to a class of 58 leaders from the corporate, civic, small business, community, creative, nonprofit, healthcare, judicial, government, religious and academic institutions, sectors, and communities. The leadership birmingham class of 2025 was exposed to our area's critical issues in education, economic development, justice, local and regional government, health, human services, and quality of life through visits to 35 sites and meeting with over 326 experts. They discussed and debated our community's issues, developed lasting relationships, and collaborated on six group projects that positively impact the greater birmingham community and its people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.7%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.3% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 58 of 60 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $417K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 60 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.