Lead Intergenerational Solutions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822602700
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,410
- Expenses
- $54,951
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Janet Dewart Bell (Founder & President)
- Naomi Nightingale (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Roy Paul (Treasurer)
- Janet Dewart Bell (Founder & President)
- Jemel Alston (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
LEAD advocates that people of all ages must be involved in efforts to safeguard and strengthen our democracy. We believe that it is essential to Americas future to capture the synergy when wisdom, experience, and perspectives of established leaders and activists meet the energy and innovative spirit of young people. LEAD brings together a diverse and intergenerational group of activists and leaders to advance democracy through education and civic participation, with a focus on voting rights and social justice. LEAD develops and implements solutions to social problems by providing leadership development training, fellowships, and public speaking opportunities such as seminars, webinars and podcasts. LEAD has unique access to thought leaders, public officials, advocates and activists working to help our nation achieve a more perfect democratic union that guarantees liberty and justice for all.
What it reported doing in 2022
Race, Rights, Righteous Anger, Redemption, and Hope: The Intergenerational Path Forward
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.7%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 38.3%; rating input score 38
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.7% of revenue deployed · 38.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.