Leach Garden Friends
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930807685
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032086030
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,380,301
- Expenses
- $1,448,277
- Assets
- $1,002,172
- Liabilities
- $150,257
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BOB HYLAND (PRESIDENT)
- FRANCHESKA SNYDER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BEN SHOCKEY (EXECUTIVE DIR. (THRU 3/2025)): $94,733 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Leach botanical garden offers immersive, restorative, and educational experiences in a unique landscape of native plants and horticultural collections for the purpose of building community, celebrating nature, and inspiring environmental stewardship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Visitor services - as the garden's front door, visitor services creates the first and often most memorable connection between guests and leach botanical garden. Our team welcomes visitors from all walks of life, ensuring that everyone feels at home and that cost is never a barrier to enjoying nature, beauty and community. In fy25, the garden welcomed 33,471 total garden guests.now in its third year, garden for all remains a cornerstone of leach's mission to ensure equitable access. In fy25 alone, 1,485 guests enjoyed complimentary admission. Continued on schedule o.when combined with other free entry days, a total of around 3,600 visitors received free entry. Of all garden for all visitors to date, 75% are Oregon residents, and 36% live in our neighboring southeast portland zip codes (97206, 97266, 97236). Volunteers - we currently have over 75 volunteers whose contributions are essential to having a thriving, welcoming, well maintained garden. Volunteers assist with numerous tasks, including garden maintenance, habitat restoration, event and fundraising support, gift shop sales, garden tours, serving on the leach garden friend's board, and more. We are incredibly fortunate to have such a dedicated, positive, and hard-working crew of volunteers! The garden gift shop is staffed year-round by a capable volunteer team who handled $128,718 in sales during the 24-25 fiscal year (up from $94,864 for the 23-24 fiscal year). The shop is an essential and welcoming hub of information for visitors to the historic lower garden, as well as providing carefully selected nature-themed merchandise with a focus on locally produced items. Volunteers provided assistance for several very successful fundraising events, including the 2024 winterfest and wreath sale, and the 2025 spring garden fair, feast in the garden, boo bash, and more. Our knowledgeable volunteer docents led visitors on a variety of unique tours, including the social life of trees, the romantic tour, and the garden highlights tour.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65% of revenue deployed · 58.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $849K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $95K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.