Lchs Patriot Band Boosters

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464054918
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Garland, TX, USA
Phone
9404521026
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,089
Expenses
$75,811
Assets
$27,364

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JON CAMPBELL (President)

People named in this filing

  • JON CAMPBELL (President)
  • HOANG DO (Treasurer)
  • JENNIFER VINSON (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of The Band Boosters is to foster a mutually beneficial relationship between Lakeview Centennial High School ("LCHS"), the LCHS School Administration, the LCHS Band ("The Band"), the Band Directors, the Band Students, the Band Parents, the Community, and the Garland ISD and area districts by perpetuating a sense of pride in and commitment to the outstanding qualities of the LCHS Band and the education its directors provide to its members.

What it reported doing in 2024

The LCHS Patriot Band Boosters supports the Lakeview Centennial High School band directors and students by hosting band events events/competitions/concerts, providing student transportation and food at events, and providing music and band equipment as needed for a successful program. Funds are provided by band student dues and fees as well as some fundraising revenue and small donations for students scholarships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.6%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 3

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -57.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.6% of revenue deployed · 2.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.