Lawrence Hopewell Trail Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200511132
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Pennington, NJ, USA
Phone
6098950813
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$176,023
Expenses
$134,144
Assets
$589,048
Liabilities
$11,052

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JORDAN ANTEBI (TRUSTEE)
  • SILVIA ASCARELLI (TRUSTEE)
  • MARIA CONNOLLY (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lawrence hopewell trail corporation, through collaboration with community, government, corporate and nonprofit partners, promotes and guides the construction, maintenance, use, and enjoyment of a 22-mile pedestrian/bicycle trail loop connecting lawrence and hopewell townships in mercer county, New Jersey, and actively encourages connections to adjacent areas and regional trail networks to ensure an enduring amenity supported by the people it serves.

What it reported doing in 2024

The award-winning lawrence hopewell trail (lht) is a 22-mile, multipurpose, mostly off-road, environmentally sensitive trail developed by a citizen-led volunteer board of trustees. It is designed to encourage health and fitness, enjoyment of the outdoors, and access to preserved open space while linking communities and neighborhoods and providing an alternative to automobile transportation, thereby contributing to a more sustainable community. The lht's primary programmatic accomplishments are: (1) managing the development of the trail that traverses corporate campuses, a private school, preserved open space, parks, neighborhoods, and a main street. This requires establishing and maintaining relationships with multiple landowners; designing segments that meet environmental, safety, and construction standards; raising funds for trail construction and support of the nonprofit corporation; and coordinating efforts with local and county governments. As of 2022, 95% of the trail has been completed. Plans are underway for the funding, design, and construction of the remainder. What is not reflected in the financial statements is the fact that in collaboration with county and township officials, over 17 million has been raised for trail construction over the years. In the second category of accomplishments are activities to encourage and promote the use of the trail through publicity, public education, and the sponsorship of community-building activities. In addition to creating the monthly saturday morning walking club, the lht holds two annual signature events. The first is the lht full moon bike ride jointly sponsored by the mercer county park commission. The second event, trail and treat, a fun afternoon for children and theirir families. In 2019 the lht artwalk was introduced. This program couples trail fans with a professional artist who teaches techniques for capturing nature on paper, canvas or film. As a result of the lht's efforts and extensive word-of-mouth, the trail is enjoyed by more than 400,000 walkers, joggers, bikers, snowshoers and cross-country skiers each year and the number is growing. The third category of accomplishment includes trail maintenance and enhancement through the addition of additional directional signage and amenities such as benches and kiosks. The lht serves as a model for public-private partnerships and a resource for other communities that want to emulate the unique success of the lawrence hopewell trail.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.4%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 65.2%; rating input score 65
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.8%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.39; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.4% of revenue deployed · 65.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $88K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.