Law Related Education Project Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870476103
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8015501893
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $386,296
- Expenses
- $255,348
- Assets
- $793,341
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- PRINCESS GUTIERREZ (EXECUTIVE DI): $42,917 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Utah law related education empowers Utah's students by engaging unique programs promoting understanding of the law, the legal system, and our rights and responsibilities as engaged citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization continued to provide law-related and citizenship education through interactive educational experiences and curricula that foster in youth and communities an understanding of the law, the legal system, and their rights and responsibilities as engaged citizens. It also continued to help our youth develop the knowledge and skills to be effective, engaged citizens through the following: 1. Program: we the people: the citizen and the constitution - 40+ teachers received books to teach the curriculum. -30+ volunteers supporting the program competitions - 25+ schools are active in learning curriculum and/or participating in the competition - the schools are a mix of public, private, and charter from throughout the state. - 200+ students participated in state competitions in the last year. 2. Program: salt lake peer court - approximately 50-60 youth volunteers serve on the youth peer panel. -approximately 5-15 adult advisor volunteers and 2 interns - approximately 10,000 hours of community service is completed each year. - 100-150 cases referred to peer court referrals come from salt lake city school district or other school districts in salt lake county. - partnerships: school districts, Utah state bar, Utah state courts, salt lake police department, Utah youth court association, and other community nonprofits serving youth and families. 3. Program: mock trial - 50-60 youth teams participate each year. - the average number of participants per team is 10. - approximately 500+ junior and senior high school students across Utah participate in the program, where the winning team has the opportunity to go to the national competition. - approximately 125+ judges, attorneys, law students, and community representatives volunteer as judges and attorney coaches in the mock trial competitions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $58.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.11; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $189K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $43K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.