Laura Ingalls Wilder Elementary Parent Teacher Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261421913
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Pearland, TX, USA
Phone
2812453090
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,385
Expenses
$41,860
Assets
$121,456

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kimberly Vellano (Vice President)
  • Sarah Buchanan (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kimberly Vellano (Vice President)
  • Sarah Buchanan (President)
  • Sarom In (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Replaced outdated ipads and protection cases. Provided monthly luncheons for teachers and staff, incentive rewards, small holiday gifts and daily activities for teachers. Provided donations for student activities such Back To School, Field Day, Movie Night, End of the Year parties, snacks for STARR, UIL, STEM Night, Trunk or Treat, Graduation, and field day.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided donations for student activities such Back To School, Field Day, Movie Night, End of the Year parties, snacks for STARR, UIL, STEM Night, Trunk or Treat, Graduation, and field day

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 77% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.7%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.9; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.