Latinos in Virginia Empowerment Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832446635
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
North Chesterfield, VA, USA
Phone
8047280048
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,974,033
Expenses
$1,280,951
Assets
$1,321,184
Liabilities
$76,789

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELVIRA DE LA CRUZ (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELVIRA DE LA CRUZ (CEO): $114,561 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in Virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education and technical assistance program: the center is committed to transforming the whole community by helping to improve the way they address the issues of violence in the latino community. That's the reason that in addition to our advocacy and victim advocate program, we focus on community initiatives. These initiatives include participation in taskforces and committees to bring the voice of latino community to those settings, creating multilingual spaces that promote that monolingual speakers can interact and build relationoships, and providing training and technical assistance for other agencies and professionals in the community. The live center has an 15 year history of working with latino families affected by violence, and a combined 100+ years of experience among its team members. Regardless of the quantity and quality of experience, we recognize that we cannot fulfill our mission by ourselves and we wish to extend it by training those in their communities to do the job of "healing families, and ending violence". The live center contributes to filling the gaps of services for spanish-speaking victims of violence by following the evidence-based model of leaders and promoters, developed by casa de esperanza. This is a peer model that aims to tap into the abilities of community individuals to share critical information and resources, as well as build community and promote healthy relationships with other community members. Research indicates that the peer leadership model has been effective in promoting a positive change in attitudes, beliefs and behaviors around the targeted issue (in our case victimization and violence in the latino/hispanic community), as well as increasing access to resources and knowledge of the topic for participants. The intent of the live center is to utilize this model in order to develop a workforce of bilingual and bicultural victim advocates who can support the delivery of direct services to victims of violence, who can play the role of educator, mentor, outreach worker, and role model, as well as serve as liaisons between their community and other service providers. At the live center we know that offering culturally specific trauma-informed advocacy is more than just being bilingual. Advocacy is looking at the entire situation of an individual, including their culture, their values, their beliefs, their families, and supporting the decisions they make. Our highly trained advocates and volunteers, all bilingual and bicultural, are able to provide trauma informed services by accompanying individuals and their families through their journey. By following their lead and supporting their goals and choices. After all, people are the experts of their own lives and journeys. Most importantly, we listen. We meet individuals where they feel most comfortable; we go at their pace; and we help them identify what they want, what they need, and how to get there. By looking at individuals and their entire situation, we can identify and build on existing informal support systems and create stronger networks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.7%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $74.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.7% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.