Latino Policy Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204252337
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9164496190
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Reported finances

Expenses
$222
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JIM GONZALEZ (DIRECTOR)
  • SAM GEORGE (SECTY/DIRECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose is to conduct research, to perform studies, to collect data, to provide public discussion forums, conferences, and seminars, to evaluate and disseminate, and to educate the public regarding general economic, social and other demographic information and data realting to problems and challenges being encountered within and by the latino population in the united states, and to suggest policies, plans, and programs aimed at addresing such problems and challenges for the benefit of the latino community at large within the united states.

What it reported doing in 2023

Promotion of latino issues in the united states through education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -112.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -44.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -34.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $222 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.