Latino Caucus of the Virginia Conference of the Umc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992665707
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Newport News, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7577682223
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $511
- Expenses
- $688
- Assets
- $3,024
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chad Beck (President)
- Nilse Furtado-Gilliam (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Chad Beck (President)
- Nilse Furtado-Gilliam (Vice President)
- Eduardo Carrillo (Executive Committee Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Latino Caucus envisions a Virginia Conference where our Latino presence is empowered to lead, grow, and transform the Church and the world through equity, innovation, and community. We commit to: Advocating for equitable resources and inclusive representation for Latino ministries and leaders; Teaching and training Latinos and allies to creatively and effectively grow Latino ministries across the Conference; and Mentoring Latino clergy and laity to strengthen leadership and support cross-racial, cross-cultural ministry partnerships.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided three grants for members to attend conferences and take exams required to be ordained.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.4; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.