Latina Leads Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933398119
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Suwanee, GA, USA
Phone
4045420606
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$112,767
Expenses
$110,157
Assets
$17,565

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARIA ALEJANDRA BASTIDAS (CEO)
  • GABRIELA GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARIA ALEJANDRA BASTIDAS (CEO)
  • ELIENNY DIB CAIAZZO (COO)
  • MARIA AIDEE PEREZ (COORDINATOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Please see schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Our program serves approximately 100 Latina girls and teenagers, the majority of whom are first-generation migrants. Notably, around 50% of these participants do not speak English, and about 50% live below the poverty line. Through a recent survey, we learned that 100% of our girls are satisfied with the program. Furthermore, 54.5% reported improvements in their school grades. Parents have also observed significant positive changes: 72.7% noted emotional and behavioral improvements in their daughters since joining the program. Additionally, more than 60% of parents have seen increases in their girls self-esteem, and 72.7% stated that their daughters have developed leadership skills through our activities. Importantly, 81.8% of parents believe that participation has enhanced their daughters communication skills

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.