Latin American Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581237316
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4046381800
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,665,819
Expenses
$10,133,077
Assets
$14,832,373
Liabilities
$1,416,295

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANTIAGO MARQUEZ (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • SANTIAGO MARQUEZ (CEO): $202,508 total reported compensation
  • ELIEZER VELEZ (COO): $121,325 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER HAMAMOTO (MD OF LEGAL SERVICES): $111,626 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The laa empowers latinos to adapt, integrate and thrive by providing resources such as food, shelter, clothing, economic programs, a latina entrepreneural program as well as youth mentoring and immigration services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Founded in 1972 to serve atlanta's then-emerging latino population, the laa has grown to become Georgia's leading agency representing latino issues. With over half a century of success in and around the bustling metropolis of atlanta, the laa is the largest, most trusted and only fully bilingual agency in the region dedicated primarily to the needs and concerns of the latino community.the laa provides a comprehensive menu of social, educational and legal services and impacts over 25,000 individuals each year. During fy25, the laa delivered over 60,000 programmatic services to empower our clients, helping them adapt, integrate and thrive.programs include: family stabilization and well-being: this programmatic pillar focuses on fostering stable, healthy latino families through financial assistance, aging and disability information and referral program, latino basic needs program, victims of violence program, and public benefit enrollment.economic empowerment: we are empowering latinos to achieve economic success and self-sufficiency with programs that include workforce training, latina entrepreneurship classes, spanish and english second language programs, translation services, online job banks, micro loans, career expos, and corporate recruitment events.immigration services: the laa offers affordable legal services to help eligible individuals obtain immigration benefits. Services include providing general immigration legal services, immigration relief for victims, removal defense legal services and permanent resident status programs.youth services: we are focused on empowering latino youth to achieve educational success with a broad set of programs. The latino youth leadership conference, latino youth leadership academy (lyla), high school senior advising sessions, latino youth mentoring program, lyla summer programs, and latino college resources each serve to advance educational opportunities and success for latino youth in Georgia.civic engagement and advocacy: connecting and empowering community members is what makes a community. We further that empowerment through promotion of cultural awareness, with activities both public and private that include cultural and large-scale special events such as the annual latin fever ball, compaeros awards luncheon, hispanic heritage month campaign; civic engagement program; membership program; and latino community needs assessment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.1%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.1% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $203K · 27 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $114K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.