Ppi Apparel Group
Legal name: Las Vegas Minyan Inc C/o Abraham Hanan Ppi Apparel
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453537354
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, United States
- Phone
- 2127791999
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,471
- Expenses
- $9,594
- Assets
- $48,202
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ABRAHAM HANAN (PRESIDENT)
- JACOB DWECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ABRAHAM HANAN (PRESIDENT)
- JACOB DWECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PPI Apparel Group, established in 1995, is described as an industry leader in intimate apparel, sleepwear, shapewear, underwear, and related product categories. PPI Apparel Group, established in 1995, is an industry leader in intimate apparel, sleepwear, shapewear, underwear, and all related product categories. Utilizing a combination of design, brand building, licensing, acquisitions, sourcing, product development, and investments in technology, PPI has achieved great success and results for all its partners. We continue to focus on our mission and strive for continued growth into the future. PPi Apparel logo SLP1560 ANTHR-3.jpg.
What it reported doing in 2025
Sponsoring sabbath events and supporting religious ceremonies by providing kosher meals and transportation as well as renting a place to hold these events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 77.9%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.7%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.02; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 77.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.