LArche USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911355711
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032826231
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,041,408
Expenses
$2,295,157
Assets
$5,896,464
Liabilities
$145,594

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATTHEW RHODES (President)
  • TENIEL RAMIKIE (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAURA GIDDINGS (NATIONAL LEADER): $135,149 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW CALLAHAN (DIRECTOR OF FIN): $109,746 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of l'arche is to support people with intellectual disabilities and, together with our partners in the global disability movement, to build a more human society where no one is left behind.

What it reported doing in 2025

Larche USA works with and on behalf of larche communities in the u.s. To advance the rights and inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities through inclusive leadership, friendship across difference, and bringing the power of community to life. Our goal is to change society so people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are recognized as contributors and can thrive. L'arche celebrates people across the full spectrum of human ability. We work towards our mission in three fundamental ways.building unity: larche USA connects nearly 300 people with intellectual disabilities from 21 communities across 18 u.s. States with opportunities for leadership, learning, friendship, and growth. Larche USA fosters personal agency, spiritual growth, connections between larche communities in nearly 40 countries around the world, and opportunities for people with disabilities to lead both inside and outside our federation.growing impact: we believe that the larche movement demonstrates the power of kinder, more inclusive communities for the benefit of society overall. Representing 79 community-based residential settings and many participants in non-residential programs, we aim to advance inclusion and self advocacy by engaging critical issues that impact people with disabilities at the local, national and international levels.sacred stories: larche USA is launching a grant funded project called sacred stories, a five-year national initiative that will gather and share the faith experiences of people with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities through films, audio stories, educational resources, and retreats. The project advances the organization's mission by promoting the inclusion and leadership of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, strengthening connections between faith and disability communities, and expanding understanding of the spiritual gifts and contributions of people with disabilities.fostering accountability: larche USA ensures that safeguarding mechanisms to protect vulnerable adults are understood and in place in our communities. We engage in capacity building with u.s. Communities to enhance board, volunteer and inclusive leadership by promoting best practices for organizational development, learning, evaluation and impact.at l'arche, people with intellectual disabilities are supported in a network of friendship, allyship, and professional service that works to promote dignity, rights, freedom, choice, and belonging for every human being.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 25.3%; rating input score 25
  • Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $24.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.4%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 25.3% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $135K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.