Lar Do Caminho USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821443858
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Key Biscayne, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3053730056
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,815
- Expenses
- $138,041
- Assets
- $5,634
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICIA SARTI ZOTTOLO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PATRICIA SARTI ZOTTOLO (PRESIDENT)
- MARIA GABRIELA CHELI (VICE PRESIDE)
- LIA NOTO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation was organized in 2017 to provide for the relief and support, including food, shelter, counseling, health and education of abandoned or deprived children in brazil.
What it reported doing in 2022
Funds were contributed to jardim de borboletos, a non-profit organization in brazil that helps children who suffer from a rare, genetic and hereditary skin disease. The funds are used to purchase much needed medical supplies. Funds were contributed to centro educacional e profissional, a non-profit organization in brazil that provides education for underprivileged children. Funds were contributed to adote saude, a non-profit organization in brazil that provides medical and dental care to underprivileged children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 85% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 107.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.