Lanse Creuse High School Band Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141864020
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Harrison Township, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5862141213
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $215,461
- Expenses
- $213,218
- Assets
- $105,342
- Liabilities
- $25,839
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sheila Dunstan (Vice President)
- Angela Bilen (President)
People named in this filing
- Sheila Dunstan (Vice President)
- Cheryl Flanagan (Treasurer)
- Renee Williams (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fundraising including raffles to support high school music group
What it reported doing in 2025
The LCHS Band Boosters is a 501c3 nonprofit dedicated to supporting the award-winning L'Anse Creuse High School Band Program. We organize volunteer efforts and fundraising projects to provide essential support, ensuring the band has what it needs to succeed. A band booster is anyone who supports the band Whether youre a parent, family member, alumni, local business, or community member, if you're helping the band succeed, you're a booster. Boosters volunteer their time, raise funds, and provide the behind-the-scenes support that keeps the music playing. Band boosters make it possible for every student to participate, regardless of their financial situation. We raise funds each year to reduce the cost of Marching Band and other ensembles, ensuring no one is left out. Volunteers and donors provide the equipment, travel, and support needed for the band to perform at its best. When our community comes together, students have the opportunity to grow, perform, and shine. Together, we uphold the tradition of excellence that defines LCHS bands and ensure this legacy continues for future generations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.8%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.8% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $207K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.