Lander Old Timers Rodeo Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830268103
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lander, WY, USA
Phone
3073321122
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$194,124
Expenses
$230,374
Assets
$207,471
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN GAZSO (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • PAULA MCCORMICK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • AMY WAHL (SECRETARY)
  • TARA PETER (DIRECTOR)
  • JULIE FREESE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lander old timers rodeo association (lotra) is a member-driven organization formed to provide a venue to educate both youth and adults in regard to rodeo and equine related events as it pertains to participation, safety of participants, health and safety of horses and livestock, and the cultural heritage of the equine disciplines.the organization provides opportunities for equestrian enthusiasts to participate in educational activities such as practices, clinics and events where horsemen showcase their skills, learn from other participants and educate the wider community about the traditions of western riding and rodeo.the organization will accomplish this in part through efforts such as sponsoring local junior rodeo association events, high school rodeo events, and all-girl rodeos, hosting the lander pioneer days rodeo and parade.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide opportunities for equestrian enthusiasts to participate in horsemanship practices, clinics and events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.