Land's Sake
Legal name: Land's Sake Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042702759
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Weston, MA, US
- Phone
- 781.893.1162
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Land Resources Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,357,686
- Expenses
- $2,129,335
- Assets
- $7,596,318
- Liabilities
- $313,748
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS SANZONE (PRESIDENT)
- MIRIAM LEVY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH MARSHDOYLE (FORMER PRESIDENT)
- PAMELA HESS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PAMELA HESS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $114,808 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Land's Sake is a non-profit community farm.
What it reported doing in 2025
Farmcommunity supported agriculture ("csa") shares: land's sake offers the csa program in which shareholders share with the farmers the bounty and risk inherent in growing food. Shareholders participate by purchasing a season's worth of farm-raised food before the growing season begins. Csa members then pick up their share of the harvest on a weekly basis, for 21 weeks during the growing season. Depending on the type of share purchased, these weekly pickups begin in june, september, or november. Food for hunger relief: each year, land's sake donates over $25,000 worth of fresh, local, produce towards hunger relief efforts in and around boston on behalf of the town of weston. In 2025, land's sake donated an additional $264,000 worth of produce towards hunger relief for a total of over $289,000 in produce donations. This was approximately 30% of the total produce grown on the farm in 2025.conservation land management: land's sake has pioneered a public-private partnership with the town of weston to manage public conservation land for the benefit of the community.forestry: land's sake manages an innovative forestry program on public conservation land in the town of weston. Land's sake also provides a model for small-scale sustainable forestry. As part of our ongoing forest management plan, land's sake sustainably harvests hardwood trees from the weston forests to produce firewood, which is delivered each fall.pick your own: land's sake offers a number of crops for picking throughout the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.57; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 11 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $121K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.