Lancaster Ymca Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232224471
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Lancaster, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7173939622
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $140,821
- Expenses
- $76,980
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY KENDERDINE (CEO/BOARD MEMBER)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY KENDERDINE (CEO/BOARD MEMBER): $138,828 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The lancaster ymca foundation exists to provide and serve as stewards for a permanent endowment to preserve the mission and services of the lancaster family ymca. The foundation supports current lancaster family ymca programs and is creating a legacy to ensure that the lancaster family ymca will continue to pursue its mission to nurture our community through the pursuit of life-long growth in spirit, mind, and body.
What it reported doing in 2017
The organization fundraises and manages endowment funds for the benefit of the young men's christian association of lancaster county (dba lancaster family ymca). The organization provided scholarship funds to partially support 391 individual campers who were subsidized by the lancaster family ymca.note the organization transferred its assets to the young men's christian association of lancaster county by the end of its fiscal year, upon approval of a plan of liquidation. The activities and support provided by the lancaster ymca foundation will continue as an endowment within the young men's christian association of lancaster county organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.7%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.7% of revenue deployed · 70.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $139K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.