Lancaster Rural Cemetery Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161406185
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Buffalo, NY, USA
Phone
7168851606
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Cemeteries

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,986
Expenses
$63,546
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEANETTE PECQUEUR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • FRANK MADDOCK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH KEEFE ESQ (TRUSTEE)
  • JEANETTE PECQUEUR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • FRANK MADDOCK (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The board of directors and staff of the lancaster rural cemetary dedicate themselves to provide the beauty and solitude which will honor the dead and bring healing to the living and bereaved. We recognize not only the history of our cemetery and the early settlers who are buried here, but also assure the living of the perpetual beauty and care into the foreseeable future. We will provide our services at affordable costs and assist our customers in the courteous and efficient manner which is due them, often during a time of personal loss and sorrow. We will pledge reverence and dignity as we care for the cemetery in our daily operations, and as we seek continued funding and means to assure our future.

What it reported doing in 2022

To provide affordable services associated with burial including but not limited to, burials and inurnments, maintenance of the grounds and other related activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -218%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.