Lancaster Investment in a Vibrant

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201243414
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Phone
7173927891
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,128
Expenses
$123,037
Assets
$34,694

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

L.i.v.e.'s mission is to build strong and healthy communities through environmental projects. It organizes and promotes volunteer advocacy and investment in lancaster city's economic development, informs the community of economic development opportunities and initiatives, and secures and distributes resources that promote community revitalization.

What it reported doing in 2010

Urban water initiative - implemented residential and commercial education and outreach programs to reduce stormwater impacts to the conestoga river stemming from city's combined sewer systemenergy conservation and building retrofits - implemented building retrofits to two historic structures to reduce engergy consumption and expenses and continued to provide residential and commercial energy conservation technical assistance

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -114.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -108.4% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -158.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.