Lancaster Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232160896
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Lancaster, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172996371
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,648,108
- Expenses
- $17,967,378
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALISA JONES (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MATTHEW WEITZEL (SITE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, PHY): $262,915 total reported compensation
- ANNE-MARIE DERRICO (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $253,136 total reported compensation
- ALISA JONES (PRESIDENT & CEO): $249,940 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We deliver high-quality and compassionate healthcare to all - regardless of economic status.
What it reported doing in 2020
Medical services, mental health and pharmaceutical services were provided to 21,356 members of our community with a total of 67,766 medical and mental health visits in the year; 45% of our patients were screened for behaviorial health and received a follow-up plan if needed. Colorectal screening rate for our patients is 52%, and the cervical cancer rate for our patients is 44%. 83% of our adults were screened for tobacco use and re receiving cessation intervention if needed. 82% of our children and adolescents had a bmi done with counseling for nutrition and physical activity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.5%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 64.5%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $42.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.5% of revenue deployed · 64.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $11.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $263K · 23 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.