Lancaster Creative Reuse
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465586403
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lancaster, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7176172977
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Visual Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,670
- Expenses
- $137,675
- Assets
- $19,420
- Liabilities
- $3,857
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Allen Tate (President)
- Deirdre Remollino (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Allen Tate (President)
- Deirdre Remollino (Executive Director)
- Jennifer Snyderman (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lancaster Creative Reuse Mission: To inspire Creativity, increase access to the arts through affordability, and encourage reuse
What it reported doing in 2025
The community outreach programs offered by LCR include: -Providing free materials to local nonprofit orgs, associations, scouts, schools, preschools -Attending community events reinforcing the 3R's and share creative reuse as a concept -Support local art and sewing projects benefiting the homeless, refugees, those effected by addiction or other chronic illnesses such as Alzheimer and cancer, and more -Provide job skills training to individuals with special needs, helping them to gain employment
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 65%; rating input score 65
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 65% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.