Lancaster County Workforce Investment Bo

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232147355
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Phone
7177350333
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,532,403
Expenses
$6,523,713
Assets
$4,010,518
Liabilities
$4,116,979

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNA RAMOS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANNA RAMOS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $158,992 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lancaster county workforce development board seeks to align fiscal resources and provide strategic direction for lancaster county jobseekers and employers.

What it reported doing in 2024

In the program year 2024-2025 (py24), the lancaster county workforce development board, through providers of title i with the pa careerlink lancaster county, enrolled 162 adults and 138 dislocated workers, including 116 jobseekers identified as re-entrants. In addition, the pa careerlink enrolled 178 out-of-school young adults, and temporary assistance for needy family (tanf) youth.through the last program year, the team at pa careerlink lancaster county has done a great job of meeting people where they are. There are 7 hub locations that staff frequent to share information about the services and at some locations, conduct workshops. The team hasalso increased their social media presence and showcasing actual clients testimonials and created virtual options. This has helped attract more visibility for the center and increased the foot traffic by 2,000. This past program year, the pa careerlink saw 9281 individuals enter the doors seeking services. The site admin has worked with the leadership team to address pertinent labor market information including unemployment compensation, high priority occupations, career fairs and opportunities. This information is also shared with participants and customers. We continue to focus on staff development, training and development, and networking. A focus on outreach via careerlink hubs was a continuing priority for py24.customers continued to also be served through the employment advancement and retention network (earn) program of the department of health and human services and the department of corrections. 579 customers were enrolled in the earn program this year, and the staffhelped 166 jobseekers land employment. Through the services of this program, 43 met the 12-month retention goal. They also provided services such as referrals to outside agencies for education, housing, food, clothing, cultural navigation, esl, and utilities assistance; individual and group sessions, in-person and virtual workshops, andpartner-led workshops. The earn program has noted an uptick in haitian creole refugees which has led the program to invest in language translation services and additional cultural navigation services inpartnership with lancaster-lebanon iu13 and church world services.the business services team also continued to serve the employers throughout lancaster county. Through the year, the team added 69 employers to pa careerlink and 560 new job postings for the pa careerlink website. 52 events were organized and held, including recruitment events, job fairs and community partner events. 14 employer webinars and information sessions to help educate businesses about unemployment compensation, local services, federal bonding and work opportunity tax credit. They also obtained 30 on-the-job trainingmaster agreements and helped 11 participants enroll in an ojt program.the lancaster county workforce development board issued 22 incumbent worker training addendums with 16 unique companies, totaling $105,906. The lcwdb also reimbursed one employer for apprenticeship training, a newly authorized funding in py22.47% of adult participants were exited with employment, with a median wage of $18.50 per hour. For dislocated worker, 65% were exited to employment, and the median wage was $21.52 per hour.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 93% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 84%; rating input score 84; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.03; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.8% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 25 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $159K · 25 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5M reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.