Lamukani USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752874466
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Lubbock, TX, USA
Phone
8064451246
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Agricultural Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,425
Expenses
$37,740
Assets
$5,303
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RANDAL BECKLOFF (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RANDAL BECKLOFF (PRESIDENT)
  • DAN CONDER (CHAIRMAN)
  • KENT RHODES (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support sustainable development initiatives around the world that promote human diginity and seek to alleviate poverty through community resources.

What it reported doing in 2015

In order to improve community capacity building efforts, a self-help group program has been ongoing for over five years. The program has organized, trained and empowered over 2,200 women in approximately 60 rural communities. The aim of the program is to alleviate the impact of poverty and improve the home lives of women and their families through savings and small business creation. As a result of this program, women through their own efforts, have improved household living conditions, generated income to pay school fees for their children, paid for medical treatment for their children and improved household nutrition and health standards. In addition the program has taught these groups drought tolerant agricultural practices, trained community health workers and mediated discussions on social issues such as early marriage and domestic abuse cases. Additional funding has been provided to assist orphans whose parents have died of HIV-AIDS. A higher education program has been initiated with the aim of assisting deserving students who qualified for university admission. As a result ten students have been assisted to enroll in universities and technical colleges throughout kenya.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.8%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.