Lamoille Family Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030277640
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Morrisville, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8028885229
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,918,160
- Expenses
- $2,702,124
- Assets
- $4,421,008
- Liabilities
- $123,118
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CAROL LANG-GODIN (EXECUTIVE DI): $97,103 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The lamoille family center is a nonprofit organization that promotes the well-being of lamoille valley children, youth and families and supports them in meeting life's challenges through education, direct services and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Early childhood services early intervention - provides services to families with children up to age three who have a medical diagnosis, a delay or a high probability of a delay in their development. Children receive services such as speech therapy and physical therapy, while parents receive training, counseling and service coordination. Family support - provides home visits to parents and their young children to help ensure a healthy start in the early years of a child's life. Parents as teachers (pat) - this is a health resource and service administration (hrsa) approved home visiting model; pat is the model adopted by the Vermont department of health in partnership with the department for children and families as the strong families Vermont sustained family support home visiting program. The pat home visiting model is a proprietary, evidence-based model that provides parent education, support services and activities. Specialized child care services - provides child care coordination services for families who are experiencing significant stress, have a child with special needs or have exceptional circumstances. Offers support and training to area childcare providers to enhance quality care to children and families. Dulce - a family specialist is placed at a local pediatrics office to proactively address social determinants of health to promote healthy development of infants from birth to six months of age, and provide support to their families. Cis program administration - provides administrative support and supervision for the cis program, including administration and oversight of the subcontracts with community partners lamoille home health and hospice, caledonia home health and hospice, and lamoille county mental health services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.5%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.2%; rating input score 91; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.5% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.