Lambretta Club USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943488526
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 6153107732
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,477
- Expenses
- $48,857
- Assets
- $33,762
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Patrick Birke (President)
- Darcy Morey (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Patrick Birke (President)
- Darcy Morey (Vice President)
- Kieran Walsh (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lambretta Club USA is an organization that is dedicated to promoting the preservation and enjoyment of vintage Lambretta scooters. Our definition of a Lambretta is any scooter made from original Innocenti tooling from 1947- 1973 or Lambrettas that were manufactured under license in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, India and Spain sometimes under other names but always to a recognizable design; for example Siambretta in South America and Serveta in Spain. We provide insight and information to Lambretta owners so that they can enjoy these machines and preserve the legacy of this beautiful scooter.
What it reported doing in 2024
We host a yearly gathering of Lambretta enthusiasts from all over the USA. We share information on historic Lambretta vehicles, exchange parts, review new products, and educate others regarding information about these vehicles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.9%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.9% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.