Lakeville Little League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201681583
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Lakeville, MA, USA
Phone
5087251943
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,232
Expenses
$76,922
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACK TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
  • JIM MURRAY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACK TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
  • TRACIE L DROUIN (TREASURER)
  • CHRISTOPHER CAMPEAU (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Taught 250+ lakeville, Massachusetts boys and girls ages 7-12 the fundamentals of baseball in a safe and cooperative environment. The children learned the rules of the game of baseball, teamwork, and the thrill of competition. Lakeville little league baseball operated several different baseball divisions in teh spring and fall to accomplish its mission.

What it reported doing in 2014

Taught 250 lakeville, Massachusetts boys and girls ages 7-12 the fundamentals of baseball in a safe and cooperative environment. The children learned the rules of the game of baseball, teamwork, sportsmanship and the thrill of competition. Lakeville little league baseball operated seveal different baseball divisions in the spring and fall to accomplish this mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -36.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.