Lakeshore Pregnancy Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383046882
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Holland, MI, USA
- Phone
- 6163968127
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,785,346
- Expenses
- $1,802,567
- Assets
- $2,547,148
- Liabilities
- $124,230
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE VAN DRIE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GARRY MARKVLUWER (EXECUTIVE DI): $64,558 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are committed to building healthier communities by loving people to life before, during, and after a pregnancy decision. We do this by providing education and resources in local schools, churches, and pregnancy centers - sharing the love of christ and the wisdom of god concerning life, love and family.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community engagement: positive options supports community needs through fatherhood services, church partnerships, and educational programming. Fatherhood services provide men with education on pregnancy options, prenatal care, and parenting; in 2025, 455 visits were served. Church partnerships equip pastors and congregations to support individuals facing unplanned pregnancies through workshops, speaking engagements, and outreach events; 35 church presentations were conducted in 2025. Project bestlife delivers sexual and relational health education to schools, churches, and families, reaching 1,377 students across 14 schools in 2025. Our total investment in these programs accounts for 55% of the total expenses or approximately 996,000.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.