Lakes & Pines Community Action Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410900982
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Mora, MN, USA
Phone
3206791800
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,669,198
Expenses
$12,515,385
Assets
$3,403,296
Liabilities
$928,950

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENISE STEWART (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DENISE STEWART (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $145,177 total reported compensation
  • PAIGE CARROLL (FISCAL DIRECTOR (THRU 8/2025)): $66,866 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To build prosperous communities by serving local families and individuals in pursuit of self-reliance.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community services has a variety of programsemergency housing assistanceprovided case management and/or financial assistance to individuals or families who experienced a temporary housing crisis that could have rendered them homeless. Funds helped by assisting with mortgages, rent, deposits, transportation costs, and emergency shelter costs, but also intensive case management to prevent future housing emergencies (budget counseling, resource referrals, or a permanent housing plan). Emergency shelter vouchers were provided to those who were experiencing homelessness along with assessments to be placed on coordinated entry for access to housing programs in the region. Homeless youth programsprovided case management and/or financial assistance to at-risk and homeless youth (24 years old and younger). Funds helped by assisting with rent, deposits, transportation costs, and intensive case management to achieve self-sufficiency (budget counseling, goal setting, resource referrals).volunteer income tax assistanceprovided free income tax preparation for low-income individuals and families to ensure income tax forms were filed with all the tax credits they were eligible for. Individuals and families were able to use the tax refunds to repair their vehicles, homes, and credit, which also helped to stimulate the local economy. This program also provided an additional opportunity for staff to educate the public on financial literacy topics.food shelf supportstaff members regularly donated to area food shelves (bi-weekly collections are held). Garden seeds were also distributed to area food shelves in the spring to encourage individuals and families to start growing their own food.supplemental nutritional assistance program (snap) outreachprovided outreach, education, and application assistance to area individuals and families that are eligible. This is formerly known as food support or food stamps.social security advocacy servicesprovided outreach, education, and application assistance to area individuals with long-term health issues that prohibit them from working who are also unhoused or unstably housed and are enrolled in state public assistance.healthcare access/mnsureprovided outreach, education, and application assistance to area individuals and families to obtain affordable healthcare coverage, either through public programs or private insurance companies through the health care exchange called mnsure.bridges rental assistanceprovided rental assistance to households with mental illness while they wait for income-based housing or section 8 housing programs. Long-term homeless supportive housingprovided ongoing rental assistance to households who are long-term homeless and also have a disability. This supportive housing program is a scattered site.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 88% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $10.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 27 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $262K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.