Lake Washington Symphony Orchestra
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454898098
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4254490480
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Symphony Orchestras
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $104,059
- Expenses
- $338,972
- Assets
- $347,052
- Liabilities
- $542
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BROOK ROSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MARY KANTOR (PRESIDENT)
- MARTHA GARRETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BROOK ROSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $72,675 total reported compensation
- ELAINE WALTERS (BOARD MEMBER): $13,194 total reported compensation
- DEBORAH MCCLELLAN (SECRETARY): $7,268 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To unite communities through performance, outreach, and education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Lake Washington symphony orchestra (lwso) delivered 21 programs, including rehearsals, concerts, and community performances that advanced our mission, to enrich and inspire our communities through performance, outreach and education. These programs reached thousands of residents across the eastside and strengthened cultural vitality through free and low cost events.redmond saturday market performances: lwso presented eight free small ensemble concerts at the redmond saturday market, bringing live orchestral music directly into a bustling community space. These informal performances reached diverse audiences, including families, seniors, and passersby experiencing orchestral music for the first time. The series continues to build community connection and visibility for the arts.annual children's halloween concert: now in its 9th year, this beloved family tradition welcomed hundreds of children and caregivers for an engaging, sensory-friendly introduction to orchestral music. Families return year after year, and many describe it as a "can't miss" annual event. The program included costumes, interactive elements, and accessible musical storytelling designed to spark curiosity and joy.annual holiday pops concert: lwso's holiday pops brought together community members of all ages for a festive celebration featuring seasonal favorites and a guest vocalist. The concert supports intergenerational connection and provides an affordable, high quality arts experience during the holiday season.annual education concert: lwso presented its third education concert, serving students from lake Washington and bellevue school districts. Nearly 2,000 students, teachers, and chaperones attended at no cost. Teachers consistently report that this is a highlight of their school year, and many send follow up emails praising the program's cultural representation, student engagement, and alignment with classroom learning.celebrating women concert: the program highlighted the work of women composers-voices historically underrepresented in classical music. The concert advanced lwso's commitment to cultural equity and artistic representation while offering audiences a powerful, inspiring musical experience.across all programs, lwso delivered 21 rehearsals and performances, including free community concerts, youth education programs, culturally representative performances, and family centered events. Audience enthusiasm, repeat attendance, and positive feedback from educators and families demonstrate the orchestra's growing impact and the community's strong support for accessible arts programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -225.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $246K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.