Lake Wales Soccer Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201391381
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Lake Wales, FL, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,285
- Expenses
- $123,688
- Assets
- $108,772
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Anthony K Mathewson (Director President)
- Christine Daly (Director Vice President and Registrar)
- Ryan Nichols (Director Incoming Vice President)
- Robert D Shields Jr (Director Past President)
- Brandon McWhorter (Director Incoming President)
People named in this filing
- Anthony K Mathewson (Director President)
- Christine Daly (Director Vice President and Registrar)
- Kendra McBee (Director Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide low cost Soccer for the community
What it reported doing in 2025
Recreational teams approximately 575 players in the spring season and 625 in the fall season. The objective of the league is to provide and avenue for both the recreational and competitive player to learn the game while improving their individual skills. We also provide services to the local schools for elementary middle ad high school for no charges. Our player registration fees for players is extremely low as we get team sponsorsfrom the community. We have the philosophy that no child is turned away if they cannot afford the fee. We give scholarships. All board members coaches and other volunteers are not paid. Only referees are paid. Most of the board have been volunteers since the inception of the club in 2004.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.