Lake Volleyball Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270763592
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
4253437114
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,745
Expenses
$40,619
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RACHELLE MANSKE (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • KEITH MANSKE (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)

People named in this filing

  • RACHELLE MANSKE (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • KEITH MANSKE (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lake volleyball club was created to give our community of snohomish county an affordable opportunity to play competitive club volleyball. We are committed to the growth and development of our talented and hardworking volleyball athletes. Our goal is to give our athletes quality court time, great coaching, and tough competition. We believe in accomplishing this goal in a fun and positive atmosphere created by the players, parents and coaches at this club.

What it reported doing in 2020

Lake volleyball club is registered in the puget sound region of USA volleyball. The club provides a place for girls ages 11-18 to play volleyball on organized teams that practice in the lake stevens area. The club provides impact certified coaches that are registered with USA volleyball and background checked through the puget sound region.the club season for volleyball starts with tryouts at the beginning of november and concludes memorial day weekend in may for most teams.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -23.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.