Lake Superior Community Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383399409
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Marquette, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9062266591
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $902,623
- Expenses
- $880,851
- Assets
- $888,670
- Liabilities
- $508,493
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER GERMAIN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER GERMAIN (CEO): $106,110 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.
What it reported doing in 2023
Foster commercial development Economic Development - Provide economic development and training 2023 highlights included Childcare SPARK - combined the best of business development principles, business accelerator practices, and early childhood education knowledge to assist participants in quickly standing up in-home childcare businesses all three participants now have licenses and are open four additional participants in the new hybrid version anticipated regional expansion underway Marquette County Housing Target Market Analysis - provided critical data on current and future market trends for housing including demand, demographics, and more. Having such data available removes a barrier to encouraging new housing development Marquette Sawyer Air Service Demand and Leakage Study - provided critical insight into market forces we are contending with as we re-establish and expand service at our regional airport Central U.P. Small Business Support Hub - a collaboration of seven strategic partners. The Hub will coordinate and expand access to small business support resources.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $733K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.