Lake Oroville Little League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942452426
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oroville, CA, USA
Phone
5302826356
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$141,955
Expenses
$122,180
Assets
$99,650

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DUSTY SMITH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DUSTY SMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • KEITH LAWRENCE (VICE PRESIDE)
  • MIKE DOMOE (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through its charter with little league baseball, inc., oroville little league's, purpose is to promote, develop, supervise, and voluntarily assist in all lawful ways, the interest of those who will participate in little league baseball and softball. Through proper guidance and exemplary leadership, the little league program assists youth in developing the qualities of citizenship, discipline, teamwork, and physical well-being by espousing the virtues of character, courage and loyalty. The little league baseball and softball program is designed to develop superior citizens rather than superior athletes.

What it reported doing in 2024

The league each year organizes teams from t-ball through juniors encompassing ages 4 to 15 years old youth of the community. There are over 300 children participating in the league. The league provides a form of sportsmanship, fun and athletic training for the youth of oroville, ca boys hardball and girls softball games are organized and played 9 months of the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.