Lake Mary Lacrosse

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270103220
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Longwood, FL, USA
Phone
4079277322
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,631
Expenses
$36,794
Assets
$9,285

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY DELUCA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NICK HANDY (TREASURER)
  • ANTHONY DELUCA (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the mohicans lacrosse club is to promote, develop and further expand participation in the game of lacrosse in the lake mary community. The program will emphazize proper lacrosse fundamentals and a comprehensive knowledge of the game, adhering to the "best practices" of the top high school programs in the country. Our youth mohicans coaching staff will provide playing time for all players - both in practice and games - allowing each and every player to reach his maximum potential.

What it reported doing in 2024

Lake mary lacrosse developed an athletic program tailored to teach the following fundamentals of lacrosse to the community: teamwork, mastery of lacrosse fundamentals and constant communication on the field. While at the same time, establishing a winning tradition by cultivating a team mindset. The organization promises not to compromise our mission of developing youth players in the interest of short-term success. Developing great lacrosse players, but more importantly, producing great teammates.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.