Lake Highlands Highlandettes Parents Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751840556
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4695931000
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $157,195
- Expenses
- $103,330
- Assets
- $176,221
- Liabilities
- $41,500
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY DARWIN (PRESIDENT)
- CARY WOODALL (FIRST VP, PRESIDENT ELECT)
- GRETCHEN ROLLINS (SOCO PRESIDENT MOM)
People named in this filing
- AMY DARWIN (PRESIDENT)
- ERIN COVINGTON (SENIOR LT. MOM)
- CARY WOODALL (FIRST VP, PRESIDENT ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support for the high school drill team for educational and leadership training opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Revue (show): the highlandettes produce a spring show each year called "revue" where the highlandettes perform all of their competition dances along with other themed dances, including solos from the drill team captain and 1st lieutenant. The highlandettes receive revenue through ticket sales to the general public as well as advertising revenue from local businesses who advertise in the revue program that is given out to spectators who come watch the show.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.7%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 33.2%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.3%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.7% of revenue deployed · 33.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.