Lafayette Renaissance Charter Academy
Legal name: Lafayette Charter Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461200082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lafayette, LA, USA
- Phone
- (225) 529-2206
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,267,611
- Expenses
- $82,180,299
- Assets
- $271,257,197
- Liabilities
- $280,670,095
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARY LOUELLA RIGGS-COOK (PRESIDENT)
- ERICA WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY C LEMIRE (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $136,492 total reported compensation
- RONNIE HARRISON (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $133,081 total reported compensation
- CLOVIS J BENOIT III (FELLOW PRINCIPAL): $128,121 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our Mission is to provide a learning environment committed to academic excellence for all students through rigorous instruction, technology integration, and parental and community involvement.
What it reported doing in 2024
The lafayette programs/activities include general education for the instruction of students, transportation including bus services for students and administration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.4%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 62.1%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.3; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.03; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 64.4% of revenue deployed · 62.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $51M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $23.3M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.