Lady Bugg House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272951119
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Phone
3164402844
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Temporary Housing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$101,593
Expenses
$119,846
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHELLE PITMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT PITMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHELLE PITMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT PITMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GARY BUGG (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of lady bugg house, inc. Is to help young mothers become self-sufficient by providing them with a safe living environment, education, spiritual discipleship, biblical counseling and support for long-term economic independence, child development, parenting and life skills.

What it reported doing in 2013

Lady bugg house consistently serves on average 12 young mothers and their children through our resident and non-resident program. Our program is designed to support a young mother and her children in all aspects including emotionally, physically and spiritually. Our goal is to help young mothers walk out of a life of poverty and to thrive independently in society once she completes our program. Although some of the girls use state benefits while they are in our program, our goal is that they will be able to support themselves financially once they complete the program. Our funding comes from private donations and private grants. This funding supports the ministry programs. The ministry provides shelter, parenting classes, education guidance, and resources to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the girls and their children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 40.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -62.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $120K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.