Labor Mobility Partnerships Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841991867
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2028009251
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,482,743
- Expenses
- $2,908,812
- Assets
- $1,553,603
- Liabilities
- $207,585
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REBEKAH SMITH (PRESIDENT/ED)
Highest reported compensation
- ELICIA CARMICHAEL (DIRECTOR): $200,826 total reported compensation
- REBEKAH SMITH (PRESIDENT/ED): $173,820 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY GERONIMO (KEY EMPLOYEE): $145,197 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lamp's mission is to lift millions of workers and their families out of poverty. We work to dramatically increase the scale and quality of labor mobility, helping workers from low-income countries to access quality jobs across borders and businesses in high-income countries to address deepening labor shortages.
What it reported doing in 2024
Lamp improves the quality of existing labor mobility pathways primarily by professionalizing the recruitment industry, improving transparency, and dramatically reducing risks of debt bondage for migrant workers. Responsible recruitment gives workers access to well-paid, rights- respecting jobs abroad while mitigating the risks they face in the migration process. It further provides businesses with access to a steady pool of highly reliable workers that will make it easier to increase productivity gains. Historically, however, the recruitment practices in many migration corridors are unethical and rife with fraud, forcing workers into severe debt or forced labor, driven by perverse incentives built into the design. To improve the quality of recruitment, lamp tailors each project to the realities of each corridor and sector where we work. In some cases, we support by working with existing market players on cost-effective ways to adopt responsible practices or incentivize the transition. In other cases, we help seed a new industry of responsible actors or bolster the delivery capacity and market share of existing ones. In all cases, we seek solutions that acknowledge and help further the interests of everyone at the table - buyers, employers, recruiters, and workers - so that responsible recruitment can be sustained in the long run. Additionally, we recognize that information asymmetries-both in the information provided to workers and about workers' experiences-is a key driver of the risks migrant workers face. To address this, we build tech- based transparency tools that provide visibility into migrant recruitment and employment conditions. We design these tools to be cost-effective in order to deploy them at large scale, and have used them both to monitor recruitment conditions with committed partners and to elevate migrant voices when making policy and program design choices. Moreover, as we design financial products to unlock migration at scale, we take a critical eye to issues of how financial products influence quality. Specifically, we are tackling the issue of debt bondage in tandem with increasing worker opportunity and agency through new financial product designs. Historically, migrant-focused debt has earned a reputation for exploitative practices; it has been characterized by informal agreements with bad actors, usury, poorly designed credit products, and information asymmetries. These are among the reasons why workers fall into debt bondage or, at a minimum, fail to reach the promise of a higher net income while working abroad. We develop financial products that alter the distribution and timing of costs associated with the migration process - whether through insurance systems, working capital for recruiters, or skilling loans to workers, to expand access to migration opportunities across a wider income distribution while minimizing the risks migrants face.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 51
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -96.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 41.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $201K · 10 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $321K reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.