La Vernia Intermediate Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453843213
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- La Vernia, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8307796640
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,947
- Expenses
- $56,542
- Assets
- $77,632
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sierra Ibrom (LV Intermediate PTO President)
People named in this filing
- Sierra Ibrom (LV Intermediate PTO President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary exempt purpose of the Lavernia Intermediate PTO is to support and enhance the educational experience of students by fostering a strong partnership between parents, teachers, and the school community. The organization works to promote student success through volunteerism, financial support, and programs that enrich learning, encourage academic achievement, and recognize the efforts of both students and staff. Additionally, the PTO provides resources and funding to supplement the schools needs, support teachers, and create a positive and engaging school environment.
What it reported doing in 2025
Teacher grants were given to each of the classrooms; benefiting each of the 835 students. 41 teachers were granted classroom funds.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.8%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 65.6%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -59.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 80.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.8% of revenue deployed · 65.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.