La Societe Francaise De Bien Mutl De L A
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 950752720
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Calabasas, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2136252526
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fraternal Societies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,308,334
- Expenses
- $844,833
- Assets
- $152,920,094
- Liabilities
- $32,507
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALFRED BEZI (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TINA STEVENSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARGARET SHOUKRY (SECRETARY)
- GARY WILFERT (TREASURER)
- RETTA ETCHEGARAY (MEMBERSHIP CO-CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We offer members opportunities for social interaction with other members of french descent, french cultural events and financial support to help cover members' out-of-pocket medical expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 92% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 95
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26.9%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 77.5%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 181.01; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 26.9% of revenue deployed · 77.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $655K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $147K reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.